Yikes! It looks like you've only been getting your information from the corporate and government owned media. But don't worry! You can increase your knowledge with just a little bit of effort. Your homework is to unplug your cable TV, start doing independent research, and polishing up your critical thinking skills. Connect-the-Dots isn't just a game for kids!
You've barely passed the 9/11 trivia test. While you should feel good, there is a lot of room for improvement. Continue doing independent research and connecting those dots, and remember - when searching for answers always follow the money!
Dang! Great job. It looks like you've done your homework. You're a diamond in the rough, a treasure chest, a unicorn. You're rocking the deluxe wizard status, fighting the good fight with your sword of truth and shield of knowledge. Never stop never-stopping!
HOMELAND SECURITY HAS SELECTED YOU FOR A RANDOM SEARCH AND SEIZURE. PLEASE HOLD. AGENTS HAVE BEEN DISPATCHED AND WILL BE THERE SHORTLY TO INTERROGATE AND DETAIN YOU, INDEFINITELY.
**Courtesy of The Patriot Act & NDAA 2012**
“It appeared to me that charges (explosives) had been placed in the building—I was surprised (the official report said) there was not."
—Ronald Hamburgerchief Structural Engineer for ABS Consulting in Oakland, CA
Normally in criminal investigations the scientific method is used to test and prove thoeries by reproducing them within experiements. However, the science used in the official report to explain the demolition of Building 7 cannot be reproduced using the scientific method as it violates some of the known laws of science and physics.
"As for NIST’s computer modeling, we found that it failed to replicate the observed structural behavior of the buildings and it required significant manipulation in order to achieve collapse initiation.
—Ted Walter, Director of Strategy and Development, Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth
Newton’s third law of motion says that when objects interact, they always exert equal and opposite forces on each other. Therefore, while an object is falling, if it exerts any force on objects in its path, those objects must push back, slowing the fall. If an object is observed to be in free fall, we can conclude that nothing in the path exerts a force to slow it down.
Applying this to WTC 7, free fall is not consistent with any natural scenario involving weakening, buckling, or crushing because in any such a scenario there would be large forces of interaction with the underlying structure that would have slowed the fall. Without pre-planted explosives, a collapse resulting in free-fall is simply not possible.
"The answer is “no.” NIST fell far short of providing extraordinary evidence — not for lack of trying or lack of resources or lack of expertise, but because there is no evidence to support the hypothesis of fire-induced failure."
—Ted Walter, Director of Strategy and Development, Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth
In 2005 the 29-story Windsor Tower in Madrid, Spain, constructed of steel exterior columns and reinforced concrete core columns, burned for almost 24 hours and suffered no full collapse and was still standing up to it's full height. When this is compared to the implosion and free fall destruction of Building 7, while keeping in mind it only maintained isolated office fires, it is clear to see the startling anomolies.
It's important to remember also that Building 7 was reinforced to be a bomb-hardened command shelter on its 15th floor, and yet it was pulverized along with the rest of the building in less that 7 seconds.
And in case it wasn't clear, Building 7 was not hit by a plane.
Last spring, the Lawyers’ Committee for 9/11 Inquiry — together with more than a dozen 9/11 family members and with help from AE911Truth — filed a petition with the U.S. Attorney in Manhattan demanding that he present evidence of unprosecuted federal crimes at the World Trade Center to a special grand jury. Then, in November, came the big news: The U.S. Attorney notified the Lawyers’ Committee in writing that he would comply with the provisions of 18 U.S.C. § 3332 requiring him to relay their report to a special grand jury.
The Lawyers’ Committee’s April 10th 52-page original Petition was accompanied by 57 exhibits and presented extensive evidence that explosives were used to destroy three WTC Towers on 9/11. That evidence included independent scientific laboratory analysis of WTC dust samples showing the presence of high-tech explosives and/or incendiaries; numerous first-hand reports by First Responders of seeing and hearing explosions at the World Trade Center on 9/11; expert analysis of seismic evidence that explosions occurred at the WTC towers on 9/11 both prior to the airplane impacts and prior to the building collapses; and expert analysis and testimony by architects, engineers, and scientists concluding that the rapid onset symmetrical near-free-fall acceleration collapse of these three WTC high rise buildings on 9/11 exhibited the key characteristics of controlled demolition. The July 30th Amended Petition included the same evidence but also addressed several additional federal crimes beyond the federal bombing crime addressed in the original Petition.
The Lawyers’ Committee concluded in the petitions that explosive and incendiary devices that had been preplaced at the WTC were detonated causing the complete collapse of the World Trade Center Twin Towers and Building 7 on 9/11, and the resulting tragic loss of life, and that “the evidence permits no other conclusion -- as a matter of science, as a matter of logic, and as a matter of law.” Both petitions and a names-redacted version of the just-filed Petition Supplement are available to the public on the Lawyers’ Committee’s webpage at
